Thursday, November 16, 2006

Currently, there are blackouts, heavy rain, and high winds in British Columbia. Over 220,000 BC Hydro customers have no power. Buildings have already collapsed and trees have been knowed down. Five Vancouver rivers were in danger of flooding, which rain fell at 10 mm an hour for more than six hours at midday.

The steel frame of a four-storey building under construction in Vancouver collapsed. Construction workers escaped injury, luckily they were on a coffee break at the time of the incident. The steel frame crushed cars in a parking lot and missed a truck driver.

Citizens had to evacuate a subdivision of 30 homes. The winds smashed trees into houses in West Vancouver.

“We have some real fears here with electrical problems,” said Captain Rob Jones Cook of the Vancouver Fire Department. “This is impinging on electrical poles and lamp standards. We also have hydro bus lines running down two sides of the building.” The Vancouver Fire Department says they have no idea as to why the building collapsed.

Winds are gusting at more than 100 kilometres an hour (62 mph) in some areas and rainfall amounts of 50 to 130 millimetres.

According BC Hydro spokeswoman Elisha Moreno, the hardest-hit areas are Vancouver, Surrey, Langley, Abbotsford and Mission, B.C. “We’re trying to be optimistic and hoping it’s by end of day today, but there may very well be customers that are into the early-morning hours before restoration,” Moreno said.

Extensive ferry cancellations, road closures, and massive power outages are in effect until the storm ends.

The RCMP have advised people to stay home and off the highway.

The same heavy weather has also affected nearby Washington State, USA.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Canada%27s_west_coast_battles_high_winds&oldid=4573748”

Friday, January 10, 2020

At about 15:30 local time (1430 UTC) on Tuesday a fire was reported in the “Kiss & Fly” section of a parking structure at Stavanger Airport, Sola in Norway. The structure has over 3000 parking spaces; reports said more than half of those were filled. The airport was quickly closed to air traffic.

It was initially reported the fire started in an electric vehicle, but news broadcaster NRK later reported the fire started in a recalled 2005 Opel Zafira. The car was recalled after a similar fire in Cork, Ireland in August last year, causing damage to about 60 cars. Police said they questioned the car’s owner.

The fire produced heavy smoke, and local officials said there was danger the building might collapse. Nils-Erik Haagenrud of Rogaland Fire and Rescue said late on Tuesday no personnel would be sent into the building. Rogaland Fire and Rescue requested support and equipment from other fire departments. The airport and nearby hotel were both evacuated and local police warned people in the general vicinity to stay inside and close exterior vents and windows. Through Tuesday evening the fire was reduced and the order for a fire extinguisher robot from Oslo Fire and Rescue was canceled.

The airport closure also led to Norwegian Prime Minister Erna Solberg being stranded after a visit to the Johan Sverdrup oil field. Solberg posted on Twitter asking for places to eat for the seven hour drive from Stavanger to the capital of Oslo.

Reports as of Wednesday said an estimated two to three hundred vehicles had been damaged or destroyed, but no humans had been hurt.

By about 22:00 local time (2100 UTC) on Tuesday the flames were under control. Local firefighters planned to continue to monitor the situation and work to prevent further damage. It was also discovered the structure was built without sprinklers. Stavanger Airport, Sola was to open on Wednesday morning, but returning to normal service was expected to take longer. Affected travelers were advised to contact their airlines for rebooking.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Fire_erupts_in_parking_structure_at_Sola_Airport,_Norway&oldid=4570223”

Market Volatility and Pensions

by

isave

The past two years have set new standards is market volatility! The gyrations in key market indices have led to periods of extreme optimism and fear among investors. It seems that when the common investor is long when there is a sell-off; and when people sell, markets tend to bounce back! Short term volatility affects the mood for long term investments.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1RCplpVaQ0[/youtube]

So what does this mean for Pension Investments? Before we talk about the impact of market volatility on Pensions, however, lets take a recap on why early investment towards a Pension Fund is important. The fact is that the earlier one starts to save for Pensions the better it is. The magic of compounding takes effect i.e. the income generated each year on previous years saving and the income earned on that. This compounding of income creates wealth. As an example, a 25 year old, retiring at age 60, will need to invest Rs 23,166 per annum for a desired pension accumulated corpus of Rs. 1 crore, if regular investments are made earning an average of 12% per annum. However, if pension accumulation is delayed to age 40, the required annual investment would increase to Rs. 138,788. One could argue that extraordinary gains can be made on large accumulated pension amounts if the investor could time the market and work towards an ideal time to cash out. The fact is that it is extremely difficult to time the market and even professional fund managers are not able to make large profits compared to the benchmark index. It is recommended that one keep the following simple examples and rules of thumb in mind in planning their Pension investments. Pension investments and asset allocation should factor the time period for the investment as well as life stage. This is because market volatility has a different impact, on investments based on tenure, and life stage on risk appetite. The fact is that needs and risk profiles change over time; and therefore asset allocation (or how much to invest in which type of investment) should change with life stage and risk profile (rebalancing the portfolio). (Link to US Securities Commission: Asset Allocation 101: http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/assetallocation.htm) For example, a regular investment with a residual period of 1-3 years is likely to be effected very differently under extreme market volatility, say if the market falls 20%; compared to a regular investment with a residual period of 10 years. A person approaching retirement can see their Pension Asset depleted significantly if their investments are in an Equity Fund and the market falls by 20%. The longer term investment, on the other hand, will have both longer to recover from the market sell-off; as well as benefit from additional investments at lower prices. Similarly, a person approaching retirement would have a lower risk profile, given the upcoming need to draw on the pension; compared to a person aged 25 who can keep investing regularly and therefore need not be impacted by volatility, and can use market volatility to their benefit by averaging the cost of regular investments. It is important that both these factors be considered and investments made appropriately in a Pension Fund. Despite the market volatility of recent times, longer term, regular, investment in Equities returns higher returns compared to investment in fixed income securities. For any lump sum investment targeted at an Equity linked Pension Fund, in times of extreme volatility, one could invest 30-40% in a single lump sum; with the balance invested in a Debt oriented fund with systematic transfers into the Equity Fund thereby providing averaging of prices during the investment period. The general rule of thumb for allocation to equities that may be considered is: 100 (-) Age (%) i.e. for a Person Age 30; allocation to equities can be 70% of value of investments, including bank & fixed deposits, PPF, EPF, etc. Higher allocation to Equity linked Pension Funds during an age of 20-50 for a Pension maturing at age 60 can help accumulate a larger Pension, working on the belief that the Indian economy is on secular strong growth path and consequently corporate earnings and stock prices should gain over the medium to long term, short term market volatility notwithstanding.

This article is brought to you by

i-save.com

;

India’s one stop place to compare prices and get best deals on life Insurance, car insurance, health insurance, loans, investment, credit cards and hotels, flights and travel. If you liked it and want to read more such articles, please visit our Blog

.

(c) i-save.com TM | Magi Research and Consultants Pvt. Ltd. 2010

Article Source:

Market Volatility and Pensions

Thursday, May 10, 2007

A Canadian government employee of Environment Canada was arrested Wednesday for criminal breach of trust with respect to a leak of the Conservative government’s green plan days before it was due to be made public.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) arrested the unidentified male employee following a complaint from Environment Canada’s security department. The department alleges that a secret draft copy of the government’s regulatory framework, Climate Change Section of the Eco-Action Plan, had been leaked to the media prior to being released officially to the public.

“An employee who violates the terms of their workplace security clearance, including the release of secret documents, may be subjected to legal consequences, including criminal charges,” said Superintendent Stan Burke, officer in charge of the RCMP’s financial integrity division. There was also concern that if the details were leaked, securities laws could be compromised if stock trades were made based on privileged information.

Environment Minister John Baird was forced to reveal details of the government’s climate change plan on April 24, in an opinion piece published in the media. The move came after a copy of a speech describing the plan was faxed by mistake, a day earlier, to an opposition Liberal party member and environment critic, David McGuinty. It is not clear whether the police action Wednesday was related to that incident.

The RCMP stated that the matter remains under investigation and, as such, no further details would be released at this time.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Canadian_government_employee_faces_criminal_charges_in_leak_of_environment_plan&oldid=4573751”

Sunday, August 21, 2005

A robotic system at Stanford Medical Center was used to perform a laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery successfully with a theoretically similar rate of complications to that seen in standard operations. However, as there were only 10 people in the experimental group (and another 10 in the control group), this is not a statistically significant sample.

If this surgical procedure is as successful in large-scale studies, it may lead the way for the use of robotic surgery in even more delicate procedures, such as heart surgery. Note that this is not a fully automated system, as a human doctor controls the operation via remote control. Laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery is a treatment for obesity.

There were concerns that doctors, in the future, might only be trained in the remote control procedure. Ronald G. Latimer, M.D., of Santa Barbara, CA, warned “The fact that surgeons may have to open the patient or might actually need to revert to standard laparoscopic techniques demands that this basic training be a requirement before a robot is purchased. Robots do malfunction, so a backup system is imperative. We should not be seduced to buy this instrument to train surgeons if they are not able to do the primary operations themselves.”

There are precedents for just such a problem occurring. A previous “new technology”, the electrocardiogram (ECG), has lead to a lack of basic education on the older technology, the stethoscope. As a result, many heart conditions now go undiagnosed, especially in children and others who rarely undergo an ECG procedure.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Gastric_bypass_surgery_performed_by_remote_control&oldid=4331525”

Buffalo, N.Y. Hotel Proposal Controversy
Recent Developments
  • “Old deeds threaten Buffalo, NY hotel development” — Wikinews, November 21, 2006
  • “Proposal for Buffalo, N.Y. hotel reportedly dead: parcels for sale “by owner”” — Wikinews, November 16, 2006
  • “Contract to buy properties on site of Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal extended” — Wikinews, October 2, 2006
  • “Court date “as needed” for lawsuit against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal” — Wikinews, August 14, 2006
  • “Preliminary hearing for lawsuit against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal rescheduled” — Wikinews, July 26, 2006
  • “Elmwood Village Hotel proposal in Buffalo, N.Y. withdrawn” — Wikinews, July 13, 2006
  • “Preliminary hearing against Buffalo, N.Y. hotel proposal delayed” — Wikinews, June 2, 2006
Original Story
  • “Hotel development proposal could displace Buffalo, NY business owners” — Wikinews, February 17, 2006

Saturday, March 4, 2006

Buffalo, New York —The Common Council requested on Tuesday that a picture be found on what many thought was the site of a previous hotel.

The Proposed Elmwood Village Hotel would be placed on the intersection of Elmwood and Forest. It was suspected by residents and business owners in the area that hotel once stood in the same spot.

The Elmwood Village hotel is a proposed development by Savarino Construction Services Corp. In order for the project to proceed, at least five buildings (1119-1121 Elmwood) would need to be demolished. All five houses are currently occupied by businesses and residents.

After some research, a freelance journalist writing for Wikinews was able to determine that there was never a hotel on the proposed Elmwood Village Hotel site. However; there was a temporary hotel located on the northeast corner of Elmwood and Forest.

Buffalo was the host of the Pan-American Exposition from May 1 until November 2, 1901. It was a fair designed to feature the latest in technology, including electricity. There was a midway, athletic events, and had African, Eskimo, and Mexican villages. However; what is likely the most famous event that took place at the exposition was the assassination of then President William McKinley on September 6, 1901. He was shot by Leon Czolgosz just outside the Temple of Music and died eight days later while in the home of John Milburn on Delaware Avenue in Buffalo. Just a short time later, Theodore Roosevelt was inaugurated on September 14, 1901 at the Wilcox House on Delaware Avenue in Buffalo. Nearly eight million people attended the exposition.

During that time several hotels and rooming houses were built around the exposition including The Elmwood at 717 Elmwood, the Hotel Elmhurst at Forest and Lincoln Parkway, Hotel Gibbs 1005-1021 Elmwood, the R. Palmerton Merritt at 441 Forest and The Norman at 422 Forest. None of these hotels or rooming houses exist today.

Probably the most famous hotel that was built during the exposition was the Statler’s Pan-American Hotel built by Ellsworth Milton Statler A freelance journalist writing for Wikinews has obtained the only known reproduction photo of the hotel [pictured at the top]. The hotel stood on the northeast corner of Elmwood and Forest Avenues in Buffalo, had 2,100 sleeping rooms and accommodations for 5,000. At the time, the Statler was the largest hotel [based on the number of rooms] ever constructed. It was also the largest temporary hotel. It was three stories high, plastered on the inside, made mostly of wood and was covered with ornamental staff on the outside, which made it semi-fireproof. Every room was an outside room and was well lighted and ventilated. It was located within one block of the exposition’s main entrance.

The Statler was built for only one thing, the exposition. Work began in 1900 and finished just before the beginning of the exposition. When the exposition ended in November, the hotel was taken down.

Maps from 1894 show that there was no hotel, let alone any buildings or houses on the intersection. However; research did show that the homes 1119-1121 Elmwood, the buildings that would be demolished to build the Elmwood Village Hotel, were built sometime before 1915 but were not on the intersection prior to 1902.

Based on research conducted at the Buffalo Historical Society, it was concluded that between the years of 1890 and 1902, no other major hotel existed in the area. In fact, research had shown that almost every hotel built in the area, existed only during the time of the exposition.

Research also indicated a hotel or a rooming house at 1089 Elmwood around 1901-1903. The only known name of the hotel was the John C. Hill Hotel. The hotel was in the house now called the Atwater House. The house was the first house to be built on the east side of the block.

The Atwater House is currently vacant and owner Pano Georgiadis wants to demolish it to expand his restaurant. The house was built by 1894 and the original owner and builder of the house is currently unknown. Its earliest known occupant was Edward Atwater who in 1862 founded the oil refinery company of Atwater & Hawes in Buffalo. The site of this company was recently uncovered in the Canal District during an archeological dig.

At the moment, current research does not show any connection between the two men.

The exposition was a commercial failure and what profit Statler did make on the hotel, went to build another temporary hotel for the 1904 St. Louis Exhibition. That hotel was successful and the profit made from it was used to build the first permanent Statler Hotel at 107 Delaware Avenue in Buffalo. The hotel is no longer in operation, but small offices are currently operating in parts of the building.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=No_hotel_previously_on_site_of_proposed_Buffalo,_N.Y._hotel_location&oldid=1981808”

Submitted by: Life Quotes, Inc

Whether you re headed to Haiti as a volunteer helping to restore the earthquake-ravaged country, or to Iraq as an employee rebuilding its infrastructure, or even off the shores of Somalia as ship crewmember and scuba diving adventurist, you or your boss will most likely be looking at higher premiums if you can get life insurance at all.

All three countries are included on the U.S. State Department s travel warning list, which is updated constantly, and which insurance brokers say is used to determine how much you will be charged for a new or updated life policy or if you will be offered a policy altogether.

According to the Web site, travel warnings are issued to describe long-term, protracted conditions that make a country dangerous or unstable, or when a U.S. embassy or consulate closes, restricting government aid to its citizens there. The list includes war-torn countries like Iraq and Afghanistan, Chad and Sudan with their rebel violence and

Mexico with its violence among drug cartels. In each case, the chances of being kidnapped and held for ransom, or injured or killed in the crossfire, are real.

The more unstable and dangerous a country is and the more likely something bad will happen, the less likely you are to get insurance, not even from Lloyd s of London, which provides specialty insurance if you can pay the price, says Ryan Pinney, a high-risk specialist with Pinney Insurance Center, Inc. in Roseville, Calif.

Members of the military going into war zones have coverage through the government-provided Servicemen s Group Life

Insurance, which Pinney says costs about $24 a month for $400,000 coverage. In addition, many private insurance companies cover all military members at no extra cost, says Michael Tessler, president of Brokerage Unlimited in St. Louis, Mo.

However, most companies won t insure you if you are going to a war zone as a contractor or working on an oil rig off the coast of Nigeria.

Iaian Donald, with Control Risks, an independent specialty risk consultancy, says some companies that send workers to dangerous places will pay for their employees life insurance as part of their accident policy. Huge corporations like Haliburton, have global policies to cover any destination. The price can be nominal if the company is big enough, Donald says. Companies that send employees to a particularly dangerous place, including foreign journalists, can buy a policy from a high-risk specialist such as Lloyd s of London for a certain number of staff and the underwriter will come up with a price, Donald says.

Pinney says if you re just flying into Afghanistan s main airport, which is a green zone, and don t leave the area, and can document that, insurance companies will insure you.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP9W7qsWtlM[/youtube]

If you re doing long-term missionary work in a dangerous country with no easy access to good medical care, few insurance companies will insure you, Tessler says.

If you re a member of the American Red Cross or the Peace Corp., Pinney says you will need to have your own life insurance as neither agency provides it for their volunteers. He says you would probably be limited to standard health class if embarking on a two-week trip to help a dangerous country like Haiti, which means you ll have a mid-rating if you are relatively healthy. He says underwriters will look at where you re going, what you ll be doing while there and how long you ll be gone, to determine a price.

It could cost you as much as 25 to 50 percent more for a policy because of the danger, Pinney says.

If you plan on indulging in extreme sport activity such as scuba diving or rock climbing during your off-work hours, expect to pay even more. Pinney says you are rated up two times for each sport you do. You could pay 50 cents per $1,000. Multiply 50 cents by a $100,000 policy and it gets expensive. If you buy the cheapest 10-year term insurance you would pay $160 to $180 a year for a $500,000 policy if you re rated preferred best, and $310 to $360 a year for a standard policy if you do these sports, Pinney says.

Top 10 Most dangerous countries

Following is a list of the top 10 most dangerous countries in the world right now, according to Control Risks. The company advises and assists corporations, government and non-government entities to help reduce their and their employees risks. Some countries are just dangerous in specific areas, as listed, not necessarily the country as a whole.

For example, if there is a high risk for travel, foreign visitors from the U.S. may find themselves in a situation where there is a chance of being kidnapped when traveling by foot or land, or they may be unable to get a flight out of the country if civil or political unreast erupts. Also, some countries are so dangerous for foreign travelers that there is a high probability that if something were to happen to them, the embassy in that region would not be able to help.

The countries are listed in alphabetical order; all are extremely dangerous in terms of security, most in terms of travel, and all are on the U.S. State Department travel warning list.

1.

Afghanistan: With the war on terror having shifted from Iraq to Afghanistan, and the risk of terrorism high, the country as a whole is considered extremely risky for travel, according to Donald. Control Risks rates it extremely risky when it comes to operating a business in various regions of the country. For instance, there are risks that would impact a business logistically in addition to fraud and corruption which often includes exposure to officials seeking bribes. Also, there are high security risks, a great potential for terrorism and extreme political unrest.

2.

Chad, Sudanese border: The two countries have been engaged in hostile relations for years, with each supporting rebel groups in the other country. The battles have left many dead, particularly in the Darfur region of Sudan. Control Risks rates it extreme for security, high for political unrest, travel and business ventures and low for terrorism.

3. Congo (North Kivu province): Militia violence against the government in this African country has placed it high on the warning list, Donald said. It received extreme ratings for security and travel, political unrest and business operations and low for terrorism.

4.

Iraq: U.S. troops still are primarily in this country now to keep peace between the Arabs and Kurds, but hostile relations between the two sides continue. It is still rated extremely dangerous for security, terrorism and travel, high for politics and business operations, Donald said.

5.

Pakistan: The threat of terrorism and the security factor against the government have placed the entire country on high security alert, Donald said, with the Federally Administered Tribal Areas the only area in the world to receive extreme risk ratings across the board from Control Risks. The military has been especially active in this Afghan Taliban and al Qaeda stronghold.

6.

Palestinian Territories, Gaza Strip: Ongoing fighting between Palestinians and Israelis over this portion of land has consistently placed this area on the travel danger list. Control Risks rates it extremely dangerous for political, security and travel reasons, high for business operations and low for terrorism.

7.

Somalia: With no working government, law enforcement or institutions, and with pirates attacking ships on the water, this country has been labeled dangerous both on land and water, Donald said. It has been given extremely dangerous ratings in all areas but terrorism, where it was given a high rating for danger by Control Risks.

8.

Sri Lanka: Fighting government factions have resulted in one of the longest and bloodiest wars in Asia. The northern province is particularly dangerous, according to Donald, receiving extreme ratings for political, business operations and security reasons and high ratings for terrorism and travel.

9.

Sudan, Darfur: Decades of civil war have included genocidal violence, rapes and mass displacement against civilians, many of whom are left in refugee camps. It received extremely risky ratings in security and travel, high in political unrest and business operations and low in terrorism.

10.

Yemen, Saada Province: Fighting between the Yemeni army and rebels in this Northern Province has left many dead and buildings destroyed. And it has left the Saada region with an extreme rating for security and travel, and a high rating for political unrest, business operations and terrorism.

This article was originally published at Life Quotes, Inc.

About the Author: Life Quotes provides access to comparative quotes for auto, life, health and business insurance quotes so that busy consumers and business owners can save time and money. Life Quotes is dedicated to providing impartial insurance information.

lifequotes.com/

Source:

isnare.com

Permanent Link:

isnare.com/?aid=578777&ca=Travel

Sunday, December 13, 2009

After more than two years, much controversy remains in the case of a British student who was killed in the central Italian university town of Perugia. Two separate trials have been held for the three suspects. All three have been convicted and are in prison serving sentences of 30, 26 and 25 years. But all three continue to proclaim their innocence.

The most well-known of the three young people convicted of the murder of Meredith Kercher in November 2007 is American-born Amanda Knox.

The British tabloid newspapers immediately described Knox as a she-devil and man-eater. A week ago, 22-year-old Knox and her former Italian boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito were convicted to 26 and 25 years in prison respectively after a trial that lasted 11 months. The prosecution had requested life imprisonment.

The third suspect, Rudy Guede, from the Ivory Coast, had previously been convicted of 30 years in prison in a fast-track trial. Nick Pisa is a British tabloid journalist who has been covering the story since Kercher’s dead body was found.

“In general I think people were expecting this verdict. It was certainly one that has been anticipated by both the Italian media and the Italian public,” Pisa said. “I think the only people who were surprised were perhaps the Anglo-Saxon press because in the face of the evidence that was presented in court it’s very, very unlikely that this case would have been found guilty in another court.”

No one argues that there is no evidence that puts Knox at the scene of the crime. But the prosecution has said there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that she was involved. He said Knox changed her version of the story many times and also unjustly accused a Congolese bar owner, for whom she had worked.

Knox’s mother, Edda Mellas, insists her daughter is innocent, that she was not home the night Kercher was killed and adds her daughter has been in prison for more than two years without reason.

“She’s devastated, she’s scared that she’s going to be stuck in jail,” Mellas said. “She’s confused… I don’t think she even believed that courts find innocent people guilty of crimes they didn’t commit and especially in this case where there was no evidence.”

Mellas paints a very different picture of her daughter than the one presented by the prosecution and media.

“Amanda’s a great young woman,” Mellas said. “She’s very bright. She’s athletic. She’s kind. She has really, really good friends. She’s just a normal college kid.”

Knox’s family members say they will fight on and appeal the court’s decision. They say the verdict, based on the evidence presented, was wrong. Nick Pisa agrees that the appeal could make the difference for Knox.

“It does appear that the evidence that convicted her was very, very flimsy and I think once they examine this DNA evidence again – let’s remember there was the request for an independent review that was ruled out by the judge,” Pisa said. “And I think that’s probably one of the first things that a new judge will ask for when he comes to review this case.”

By early March the court will provide a written document outlining the reasons behind the verdict. An appeal by Knox’s defense lawyers will be deposited soon after that. In the meantime Knox will have spent her third Christmas in an Italian jail as she awaits for a hearing date to be set, which is unlikely to be before October 2010.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Family_of_Amanda_Knox_plans_for_appeal_in_Italian_court&oldid=925106”

Tuesday, May 2, 2006

Beginning Monday morning, many BlueFrog and Blue Security users began receiving an email warning them that if they did not remove their email addresses from the Blue Security registry, they would begin to receive huge amounts of unsolicited email. As quickly as four hours after the initial warning message, some users began to receive an unprecedented amount of spam. Most of the messages were simply useless text. Users reported that Blue Security’s website was unavailable or extremely slow in responding.

Blue Security is an online community dedicated to fighting spam. As they became more popular, their member list increased substantially. The members’ email address is encrypted and added to a list of e-mail addresses that wish to stop receiving spam. Blue Security maintains the encrypted list, which uses an encrypted hash function. Spammers are encouraged to remove all addressed from their email list that are also in Blue Security’s Do Not Intrude Registry by using free compliance tools available at Blue Security’s web site.

According to Blue Security’s web site, “A major spammer had started spamming our members with discouraging messages in an attempt to demoralize our community. This spammer is using mailing lists he already owns that may contain addresses of some community members.” Reportedly, Blue Security has received complaints from users about spam allegedly sent from Blue Security promoting their anti-spam solution and web site.

Blue Security states they are “an anti-spam company determined to fight spam and as such never has and never will send unsolicited email.” There are also reports of non-users of BlueSecurity/BlueFrog receiving the warning emails, which now seems is also being sent to email addresses of people who have never added their email address to Blue Security’s Do Not Intrude Registry.

Retrieved from “https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=Blue_Security_anti-spam_community_target_of_large-scale_spam_attack&oldid=565439”

byAlma Abell

Home window replacement in Markham ON is one of the best ways to update your home. Your home is one of your biggest investments, protecting it and caring for it have to take priority. Knowing where to spend your update budget is important to ensure that you get the best return on your investment. There are a lot of updates that people do to their home that are simply for their own pleasure. They do not necessarily increase the value of the home, but they make it more comfortable for you while you live there. Windows on the other hand, make the home more comfortable for you, and they improve the home which increases the property value.

Why Windows?

If you have windows that are a decade old or older, you should know that your windows are outdated, and you are not getting the energy efficiency that you could. New windows offer several benefits that help to get you a great return on your investment:

  • Aesthetics
  • Safety
  • Energy efficiency

Aesthetics is important. New windows will improve curb appeal of your home on the outside and of course help you to see the world outside in a whole new light. They can dress up any home and make it look well-cared for.

Safety

If you have ever had to try your best to wrench an old window open, you know how difficult and dangerous it can be. New windows operate safely.

Energy Efficiency

If you have older windows it is like leaving a window or two open in the dead of winter. Old windows were constructed under different standards using different materials, they were not considered for their energy efficiency. New windows can reduce your energy consumption greatly. Platinum Home Design and Renovations specializes in windows and doors.

Click here for professional Home window replacement in Markham ON